Recently in Safety and Health in the Workplace Category

February 18, 2010

California Court Overturns Female Firefighter's Racial, Gender Discrimination Case

As California Employment Lawyers, we have been following the recent news of a California appellate court reversal of the $6.2 million verdict against the city of Los Angeles--from the lawsuit filed by black lesbian firefighter Brenda Lee, who claimed discrimination, harassment, and wrongful termination in the workplace.

According to the Los Angeles Times, the 2nd District Court of Appeal made its decision today in Lee's case, where she sued the city of Los Angeles for alleged fire department discrimination. The lawsuit accused the fire department of discrimination based on gender, race, and sexual orientation and for failing to transfer her after she filed a harassment complaint.

Lee claimed in the lawsuit that her superiors put her through difficult fire department drills that neglected proper health and safety requirements, and subjected her to derogatory and inappropriate comments and actions.

The 2007 jury decision was reportedly the largest in a line of case settlements involving discrimination and retaliation against minorities and women within the fire department in Los Angeles. The cases have allegedly cost Los Angeles taxpayers more than $15 million since 2005.

Continue reading "California Court Overturns Female Firefighter's Racial, Gender Discrimination Case" »

Bookmark and Share
February 15, 2010

Anderson Cooper Sued By Interior Designer for Injury from Unsafe Workplace

In a national employment lawsuit that our Southern California Employment Lawyers have been following, Anderson Cooper, the well known CNN new anchor is being sued by an interior designer after enduring a dangerous fall while working to design an old firehouse that Cooper is currently turning into his new home.

According to the New York Post, Killian O'Brien, the 29-year old interior designer in Brooklyn, fell 17 feet through a hole where the station's fire pole had been removed in September of last year. The hole was reportedly removed before Killian arrived, and was never covered up, reportedly causing an unsafe workplace environment that led to O'Brien's dramatic accident.

The lawsuit lists O'Brien's personal injuries as severe and permanent, and seeks unspecified damages. O'Brien is also suing residential real-estate developer Cary Tamarkin.

From 1906 to 2006, the firehouse in Manhattan was home to the Fire Patrol, a firefighting organization privately backed by the insurance industry. Cooper purchased the house from the New York Board of Fire Underwriters and reportedly plans to convert the station into a new home. Cooper hired Tamarkin who is known for performing modern residential restorations, and O'Brien, who has worked for many interior design companies as the redevelopment team.

Continue reading "Anderson Cooper Sued By Interior Designer for Injury from Unsafe Workplace" »

Bookmark and Share
February 10, 2010

Agricultural Injuries and California Workers' Compensation Claims

According to a recent Industry Scorecard from the California Workers' Compensation Institute, that our labor attorneys at HOWARD | NASSIRI, PC have been following, agricultural claims cost the California workers' compensation system $1.46 billion in loss payments.

The scorecard provides data on claims experience among agricultural workers in California for an eight-year span of time, from accident year 2000 to 2008. The study found that agricultural workers accounted for 5.5 percent of all California job injury claims, and 5.9 percent of the workers' compensation benefit payments for the state.

The report also stated that these proportions have been growing, with recent losses of jobs in other employment sectors, and that agriculture claims have increased to up to 7.7 percent of accident year 2008.

The study found that the three most common agricultural worker injury categories are:

• Strains and sprains with back problems--medical issues that do not involve the spinal cord.
• Minor injuries and wounds to the skin
• Sprains of the shoulder, knee, arm, and lower leg.

Continue reading "Agricultural Injuries and California Workers' Compensation Claims" »

Bookmark and Share
February 5, 2010

Young Workers in the Fast Food Industry at Risk--Sexual Harassment in McDonald's and Taco Bell

In Monday's blog, our California Employment Attorneys discussed a recent episode of the news program 20/20, that reported on a number of teenage sexual harassment lawsuits pending against fast food restaurants such as McDonald's and Taco Bell--where high school students have reported sexual advances from their bosses or supervisors.

In one case against the fast food giant McDonald's, 16 year old employee Kasey Ramirez was reportedly approached by her supervisor, and taken into a back room, where she was touched inappropriately. Ramirez stated that she was scared that he would rape her, so she ran out and reported the sexual harassment to another shift supervisor. The supervisor reportedly told Ramirez not to be so upset, because everyone knew that this particular supervisor was a "pervert."

McDonald's stated that they have a strict policy prohibiting any type of harassment in their restaurants. After the incident with Ramirez in 2007, McDonald's claimed to have responded swiftly to the sexual harassment charge and proved to have taken the necessary actions to resolve the case.

In another sexual harassment case in Memphis, Tennessee, a Taco Bell manager pleaded guilty to raping two of his high school workers who were both 16. One of these workers became pregnant from the rape. According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) the first victim worked with the manager for nearly two months before she was raped. The second victim was attacked on her first day on the job. Although Taco Bell denied any wrongdoing, they agreed to pay the teens several thousand dollars, and signed on to train managers on how to appropriately deal with teenage employees.

Continue reading "Young Workers in the Fast Food Industry at Risk--Sexual Harassment in McDonald's and Taco Bell" »

Bookmark and Share
January 12, 2010

Labor Violation in Los Angeles and the Role of Public Policy Development

In yesterday's post, our California Employment and Labor Attorneys discussed a new report released last week by the UCLA Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, that surveyed 1,815 workers in Los Angeles County in 2008, focusing on low-wage workers who were most likely to experience some form of wage and hour violation in the workplace--workers in professions like the garment industry, service industry, construction, and domestic help. Compared to Chicago or New York, low-wage workers in Los Angeles were most found most likely to be subjected to workplace violations based on pay.

According to the Los Angeles Times, the study was geared to focus on the largely immigrant workforce that is often missed in regular employment surveys--17% of all workers in Los Angeles County, or 750,000 people. In the report, 56.4% were immigrants with no documentation, a vulnerability that is often exploited by employers. Nearly 75% of the workers in the study were Hispanic, and almost 60% of the workers claimed to not have a high school education.

According to the five-year study, workplace violations are the result of employer decisions--on whether or not to pay minimum wage and overtime, to give workers lawful meal breaks, overtime pay, pay documentation, safe working conditions, or how to respond to complaints in the workplace.

The report found that small and large employers throughout Los Angeles County are violating labor laws on a regular basis, and that certain sectors of the Los Angeles economy have allegedly built business strategies that incorporate labor law violation--especially with Los Angeles workers who have no union representation, and who are employed in service or apparel industries, and construction.

Continue reading "Labor Violation in Los Angeles and the Role of Public Policy Development" »

Bookmark and Share
January 11, 2010

New Study Reveals More Abuse of Low-wage Workers in Los Angeles

In a recent blog, our Southern California Labor and Employment Lawyers discussed a study released by UCLA last year that surveyed over 4,000 low-wages workers in 2008 throughout Los Angeles, Chicago and New York, examining financial discrimination and systematic violations of employment and labor laws in low-wage industries.

A new report was released last week that is part of the same study, and focuses specifically on Los Angeles County, the home of the largest population of undocumented workers in this country. The authors describe this study as a significant effort to focus on the largely immigrant workforce that is often missed in regular surveys.

The study, entitled "Wage Theft and Workplace Violations in Los Angeles," released by the UCLA Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, surveyed 1,815 workers in Los Angeles County in 2008, all in low-wage professions, where the average worker's salary was $8 per hour. The study focused on domestic workers, garment workers, service industry employees, and construction workers, and found that compared to Chicago or New York, low-wage workers in Los Angeles County were the most likely to experience some form of pay-related violation in the workplace.

The survey also found that low wage workers are often robbed of their legal rights, by being forced to work during their breaks and off the clock, subjected to a lack of payroll documentation, stealing of tips, late pay, retaliation by employers, and being forced to work with employment-sustained injuries. According to the report, in almost every case, the rates of violation are higher in Los Angeles than the rates shown in Chicago or New York.

Continue reading "New Study Reveals More Abuse of Low-wage Workers in Los Angeles" »

November 6, 2009

Family Awarded $16 Million for Wrongful Death Lawsuit Against California Radio Station

As California Employment and Labor Attorneys, we have been following the Jennifer Strange wrongful death lawsuit verdict, announced last week, where a Sacramento jury awarded the Strange family $16,577,118 in compensation, after Strange died within hours of participating in the station's 2007 Radio Contest.

Jennifer Strange, 28, was a mother of three children from Rancho Cordova, and died from water intoxication, after trying to win the hard-to-get Nintendo Wii video game for her children in the "Hold Your Wee for a Wii" radio station contest--where contestants competed against each other by drinking large amounts of water without urinating or vomiting.

Strange was one out of 20 contestants in the KDND-FM "The End" (107.9 FM) morning radio show contest and made it into the final round for the Nintendo Wii prize, when after swallowing nearly two gallons of water, she lost to another contestant. After coming in second place, Strange and the winner of the contest reportedly raced to the bathroom to vomit. Strange then called in sick to work, complaining of a stomachache and a headache, and was found hours later dead in her home.

The tape of the program, called "Morning Rave" on KDND-FM revealed that during the contest, the station received warnings about the potential fatal effects of this stunt, and that during the program listeners expressed concerns that drinking large amounts of water was dangerous. One DJ reportedly mentioned the 2005 death of a college student, due to water intoxication during a Chico hazing ritual. The on-air hosts reportedly laughed about the contest stating that the participants had signed waivers releasing the station for liability with the contest.

The Sacramento County Superior Court jury found the radio station KDND-FM's owner, Entercom Sacramento negligent after ignoring multiple warnings that this contest could have fatal consequences. The jury also found that by holding this contest, the DJs and the station managers acted negligently within the scope and course of their employment, and that their employee negligence for public safety harmed Strange. The parent company Entercom Communications was not found responsible, as it was the responsibility of Entercom Sacramento employees to pre-approve the contest with the legal department of the parent company--which the employees neglected to do.

Continue reading "Family Awarded $16 Million for Wrongful Death Lawsuit Against California Radio Station" »

Bookmark and Share
October 30, 2009

Southern California Worker Fatally Crushed by Cardboard Compactor

In Southern California last week, a Los Angeles County factory employee was fatally crushed in an industrial compactor--giving the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) great concern about the health and safety of the factory's employees.

Efren Monterroso, a 64-year old employee at the factory, was found crushed to death inside a trash compactor at the Southland factory. Investigators believe that the fatal occupational injury occured Monterroso was crushing cardboard at the factory, and ended up inside the machine when it was turned on--although the reason why Monterroso was inside the compactor when it was switched on is unknown and is under investigation. He was pronounced dead by the emergency rescue crew at the scene of the accident.

In the wake of this tragic employment fatality, questions about the safety of the machine, and the safety of workers in the factory arise. According to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973, every employer has a legal obligation to maintain and provide a safe and healthy workplace for all employees. In California, all employees have the right to work in a safe environment and not be discriminated against, or wrongfully terminated if they report safety violations. Southern California employees are protected by law, and should report safety hazards--it is illegal for an employee to be fired or retaliated against for reporting safety violations.

In a 2005 fatal occupational injury survey, conducted by the California Department of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA), there were 38 machinery accident related deaths in California. Of these California employment fatalities, 19 workers were caught in or compressed by equipment or an object, and 6 were caught in operating equipment or machinery.

Continue reading " Southern California Worker Fatally Crushed by Cardboard Compactor" »

Bookmark and Share
October 22, 2009

California Worker Dies in Stadium Fall--Chargers vs. Broncos

As Southern California Employment and Labor lawyers, we were saddened to hear that a San Diego press box staff supporter for Qualcomm Stadium died this week, after falling from the press box on Monday, three hours before the kickoff of the San Diego Chargers football game.

Walter Daniels was setting up for the game between the San Diego Chargers and the Denver Broncos, when he fell down a flight of stairs, 25-30 feet below, and landed on spectator seats and concrete. Daniels, 66, had been supporting the staff in the press box for more than 20 years, worked as an official for 42 years in amateur games around San Diego County, and served on the selection committee at The San Diego Hall of Champions.

Daniels was reportedly scheduled to have hip replacement surgery, and while walking with a cane he allegedly lost his balance and stumbled down, colliding with the seats and concrete below, sustaining a fatal personal injury. The paramedics performed CPR on Daniels, and transported him to Sharp Memorial Hospital, where he died twelve hours after the accident on Tuesday morning.

The accident delayed the opening of the game by nearly 40 minutes. In a statement by the San Diego Chargers, the team expressed great sadness at the loss of Daniels. They honored his love of working in the press box on game days, and his dedication to the job.

The California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 states that in California, every employer has a legal obligation to maintain and provide a healthy and safe workplace for employees. According to the fatal occupational statistics by the California Department of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA), there were 92 construction accident related deaths in California in 2005. Of these California employment fatalities, 59 workers died due to accidents involving falls from high elevations.

Police officials and The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), will be investigating the details of the fatal injury, and examining the current status of the stadium's workplace heath and safety to determine the cause of this accident.

If you or someone you know in Orange County or throughout Southern California has lost a loved one due to a fatal accidental in the workplace, our team of experienced California employment attorneys and professionals can help. Call us for a free consultation at 1-800-872-5925.

Chargers' Game-day Staff Worker Dies After Fall, The Los Angeles Times, October 20, 2009

Chargers' Game-day Worker Dies After Fall, Associated Press, October 20, 2009

Chargers' Worker Dies After Falling at Stadium, San Diego Union-Tribune, October 21, 2009

Fall at Qualcomm Stadium Leaves Chargers Game-day Staffer Dead, JusticeNewsFlash.com, October 22, 2009

Related Web Resources:

California Department of Industrial Relations: California Division of Occupational Safety and Health, (Cal/OSHA)

The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration, (OSHA)

Bookmark and Share
October 21, 2009

OSHA Fines Chemical Recycling Company $207,800 for Safety and Health Violations

Our Orange County, California Labor and Employment Attorneys, have been tracking the recent worker health and safety violation fines brought against CES Environmental Services, by The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

OSHA has fined CES Environmental Services, Inc., based in Port Arthur and Houston, Texas, a total of $207,800, for 34 alleged workplace safety health and violations, after the life of worker Charles B. Sitting was claimed, due to improper handling of the hazardous chemical hydrogen sulfide.

The most serious of the violations was allegedly "willful," and responsible for $63,000 of that total fine. The violation was based around the company's failure to create a proper rescue team to immediately respond to an emergency, if a worker becomes incapacitated during chemical tank cleanings in the confined spaces of the barges. OSHA issues "willful" citations when employers show indifference or intentional disregard for employee health and safety.

The other 32 alleged charges were classified as "serious" violations, including failure to evaluate hydrogen sulfide exposures, create proper procedures for the processing of waste stream, create procedures for contamination, and train employees on the dangers associated with enclosed space entry on the barges. According to OSHA, a "serious" violation is one in which there is "substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer should have known."

The final "other-than-serious" violation was given for failure to remove liquid waste regularly.

CES performs a variety of jobs that involve industrial waste processing, cleaning of tanks, and recycling oil.

Dean McDaniel, OSHA's regional administrator in Dallas, claimed that if CES Environmental Services would have followed OSHA's standards, this tragedy could have been avoided.

OSHA's Houston Office began citing penalties of $16,600 in December of last year, after Sitting's death investigation in Port Arthur. OSHA has been investigating the death of another worker from July, that happened on the Houston site.

The two plants were closed in August, after a raid by federal agencies and the police. The company is also said to be connected to a criminal investigation involving the Houston Police Department, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department's environmental crimes unit, and the U.S. Department of Transportation.

OSHA's goal, under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, is to promote and maintain safe working conditions for all of America's workers.

At Howard Nassiri, PC, our Labor and Employment Lawyers are knowledgeable about defending health and safety violations in the workplace, in Orange County and throughout Southern California. Contact us today for a free consultation at 1-800-872-5925.

Confined Space-Related Death Leads to $207,800 Fine for Chemical Recycler, OSHA.com, October 14, 2009

OSHA Fines Waste Processor $207,800 for Deadly Accidents, Houston Chronicle, October 10, 2009

U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA Cites Chemical Recycling Company Following a Fatality at Port Arthur, Texas, Worksite, OSHA Press Release, October 9, 2009

Related Web Resources:

The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration, (OSHA)

Bookmark and Share
October 2, 2009

OSHA's Decline in Workplace Health and Safety Inspections

According to a report released last week by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, (PEER), the national alliance of local, state, and federal resource professionals, The U.S. Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) has reduced the number of health inspections in the workplace, despite more employee exposure to hazardous and toxic substances.

As California Employment and Labor Lawyers, we have been watching this report, in its aim to protect the health and safety rights of employees in the workplace. The PEER report states that exposures to toxic substances are connected to 10 times more premature deaths of workers than all accidents in the workplace combined. OSHA currently allocates less than 5% of its already scarce funding on protecting employee health in the workplace.

PEER discovered that the eighth leading cause of death in the US is occupational exposure--with premature deaths totaling more than 40,000 per year from neurological disease, cancer, cardiopulmonary disease, and other illnesses. According to an analysis of OSHA figures, there has been a decline in health inspection since 1991.

The report details that:

• OSHA's exposure inspections are declining. OSHA took roughly 53,000 national samples in 1997, as compared to the number samples taken in 1988--three times as many.

• At this present chemical exposure inspection rate, OSHA would need nearly 600 years or more to inspection just half of the nation's industrial facilities, where hazardous and toxic substances are handled.

• Officials in the Obama administration have not yet taken steps to change this direction, and continue to push for the quantity of completed inspections. According to the report, this gives inspectors "disincentive" to perform toxic-substance sampling, as it can often take multiple days to complete--whereas an inspector can perform several construction safety inspections in one day.

PEER is a non-profit national alliance, acting as a "watch-dog" for public interest. These figures were uncovered by PEER Board member and former director of health rulemaking for OSHA, Dr. Adam Finkel. Finkel obtained the figures from the preliminary analysis of a massive exposure measurements database for all federal and state inspections.

Finkel stated that while the EPA has lowered concentrations of harmful substances in homes across the country, workers are still exposed to extreme levels of the same harmful substances in the workplace.

Continue reading "OSHA's Decline in Workplace Health and Safety Inspections" »

Bookmark and Share
October 1, 2009

Sears, Roebuck Settles in Record $6.2 Million Disability Discrimination Lawsuit with EEOC

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced this week the approval of a consent decree by Federal District Judge Wayne Andersen, resolving the $6.2 million lawsuit against Sears, Roebuck and Co. under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)--the largest ADA single lawsuit settlement amount in EEOC history.

As Orange County, California, Employment Lawyers, we have been following this case--and the EEOC's fight to uphold the American's With Disabilities Act, protecting employees from disability discrimination in the workplace.

According to the EEOC's press release, the class action lawsuit was filed in 2004, accusing Sears of providing an inflexible worker's compensation leave exhaustion policy, as well as terminating employees without attempting first to provide reasonable accommodations for their disabilities.

John Rowe, Chicago District Director for the EEOC, claimed that this class action lawsuit stemmed from a discrimination charge filed by John Bava, a former technician at Sears. Bava sustained an injury while working at an Illinois- based Sears, and took a worker's compensation leave of absence. Although still injured from the job, Bava tried to return back to work repeatedly. Instead of giving Bava a possibility for returning to work with his disability, Sears terminating his job when his worker's compensation leave expired.

John Hendrickson, Regional Attorney of Chicago District's EEOC Office, stated in the EEOC press release that prior to the trial, hundreds of employees in similar circumstances were discovered--workers who had also taken leave for disability, and were fired by Sears--not reasonably accommodated as required by ADA law. Many of these employees only discovered that they had been fired, after their discount cards were rejected while shopping at local Sears retail stores.

Along with the $6.2 million settlement, the consent decree includes an injunction against violating the ADA, as well as retaliation. Sears will also be required to change its workers compensation leave policy, provide the EEOC with written reports detailing workers compensation practices as well as ADA employer compliance, make the decree visible at Sears locations, and train all employees on ADA law.

Stuart Ishimaru, the EEOC's acting chairman stated that this case proves that after nearly twenty years of the ADA enactment, the rights of individuals with disabilities in the workplace are still compromised. He also claimed that this record-setting settlement sends a strong message that the EEOC will protect workers' rights and advance equal employment opportunities for disabled individuals.

Sears, Roebuck to Pay $6.2 Million for Disability Bias, EEOC Press Release, September 29, 2009

EEOC Reaches $6.2M Disability Settlement with Sears, Business Insurance.com, September 29, 2009

Sears Roebuck Agrees to Record $6.2M ADA Settlement with EEOC, ADA Journal.com, September 29, 2009

Related Web Resources:

EEOC

Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended (ADA)


Continue reading "Sears, Roebuck Settles in Record $6.2 Million Disability Discrimination Lawsuit with EEOC" »

Bookmark and Share
September 11, 2009

California Whistleblower Bill Passed in State Senate

Last month, the California State Senate approved legislation that will provide employees of University of California the same legal rights and protections as other employees in the state who file whistleblowing complaints in the workplace.

Written by Senator Leland Yee, a Democrat from San Francisco and San Mateo County, the legislation gives UC employees the right to sue the University for damages if they are fired for reporting wrongdoing or health and safety concerns in the state workplace. The legislation passed in the Senate with a 22-12 vote, and will be presented to Governor Arnold Schwarzenagger for a signature of approval.

Currently, if a UC Employee files a complaint, it is reviewed by the university internally, giving the UC executives the power of both judge and the jury in cases regarding monetary claims. According to the The Daily Californian, Senator Yee stated that this was not the intent of California's Whistleblower Law. Yee stressed the immediate importance of having the Governor sign the bill to correct the statute, so UC workers will be protected in the future from wrongful retaliation when filing a complaint.

The California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) defines a whistleblower as an employee who discloses employer violations of state or federal statues, employer noncompliance with state or federal regulations, or disregard to employee safety and health.

Senator Yee introduced the bill last year in response to a July 2008 ruling against two former UC Berkley employees by the California Supreme Court. The employes claimed wrongful termination and retaliation after complaining about workplace safety in a university-managed research laboratory.

In 2003, computer scientists Luciana Messina and Les Miklosy reported multiple workplace health and safety concerns to UC supervisors while engaged in a nuclear weapons project at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The supervisors fired Miklosy in February of 2003, and Messina resigned three weeks later. Messina and Miklosy filed internal whistleblowing complaints, accusing the university of wrongful termination and retaliation for reporting safety and health issues, which led to the California Supreme Court ruling in 2008.

According to the Supreme Court findings, the California Whistleblower Protection Act prohibits state employees from engaging in unfair retaliation against employees who report fraud, waste, abuse of authority, violation of law, or threat to public health to law enforcement authorities. The Act authorizes "an action for damages" to redress acts of retaliation. But The California Supreme Court ruled that UC employees who experience retaliation as a result of whistleblowing are unable to sue for damages under the state's Whistleblower Protection Act, unless the employee first files a complaint with a UC officer, and the university fails to reach a timely decision on the retaliation complaint. This ruling exposed an oversight in the Legislature's amendment of the Act in 2001--which provided all California state employees the legal right to seek damages--except UC employees.

If approved by the Governor, the new law will change the statute currently exempting UC employees from the same protections as other state employees.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, although UC officials opposed the measure, they were in agreement with the idea that whistleblowers should have the same rights as other state employees--they should be able to sue over retaliation and be protected in the workplace.

Legislature OKs Protections for UC Workers, San Francisco Chronicle, August 25, 2009

State Senate Passes UC Whistleblower Bill, The Daily Californian, August 25, 2009

California Legislature Approves Protections for Whistle Blowers at Universities, Chronicle.com, August 24, 2009

UC Whistle Blower Protection Act Passes Senate, California Progress Report, August 27, 2009

Assembly Approves Bill to Protect UC Whistleblowers, California State Senate Press Release, July 13, 2009

Related Web Resources:

The Whistle Protection Program, OSHA

California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR)

Continue reading "California Whistleblower Bill Passed in State Senate" »

Bookmark and Share
September 8, 2009

Financial Discrimination for Low-wage Workers in Los Angeles

Low-wage workers in Los Angeles, California are routinely paid less than minimum wage, denied overtime compensation and access to workman's compensation, a recent study revealed. The survey uncovered systematic violations of employment and labor laws in low-wage industries throughout Los Angeles, Chicago and New York.

The study, "Broken Laws, Unprotected Workers," was released last week and surveyed over 4,000 low-wages workers in 2008, exposing serious financial discrimination as well as violations of the very rights most Americans take for granted--the right to receive minimum wage, overtime compensation, health and safety protection in the workplace, and the right to be treated fairly.

Funded by the Joyce, Haynes, Ford, and Russell Sage foundations, the mission of the survey was to obtain statistically accurate estimates of violations in low-wage industries often overlooked by standard surveys--reaching the "front-line" workers who cover a population of around 1.64 million workers, or fifteen percent of the workforce in Los Angeles, Chicago and New York.

The survey was based on interviews with 4,387 workers in a wide variety of low-wage industries including apparel manufacturing, private households, construction, food service, car washes, and childcare. Thirty-nine percent of the workers were illegal immigrants, thirty percent were U.S. born citizens, and thirty-one percent were legal immigrants.

According to the surprising results, sixty-eight percent of workers experienced at least one pay-related violation in the previous workweek. The average worker in a low-wage industry, who earns $339 per week, is reportedly robbed of $51 each week by employers committing wage violations. Assuming a full-time, full-year work schedule, the low-wage worker estimates a loss of $2,634 a year--a theft of wages equaling fifteen percent.

Labor Secretary Hilda L. Solis discussed the findings with the New York Times, stating that this disregard of federal labor standards was inexcusable--that these laws are, "designed to protect the neediest among us." Solis is staffing over 250 additional investigators to get to the bottom of the wage-and-hour issue. She claimed that the Department of Labor will not rest until employers follow the law, and each worker is compensated and treated fairly.

The report reveals a magnitude of wage violations--employers paying less than minimum wage, demanding off-the-clock-work, refusing payment for overtime hours, and persuading employees not to file for workman's compensation.

• In California, Illinois and New York, workers are required to receive documentation of their earnings used to verify the legality and accuracy of payment. The study found that fifty-seven percent of workers had not received mandatory pay documents.

• Only eight percent of workers who were seriously injured in the workplace filed for compensation to receive medical treatment. One-third of the injured paid for the healthcare bills themselves to avoid getting fired, whereas twenty-three percent used insurance.

• Over a quarter of workers who worked more than forty hours weren't compensated for the time during the previous week. Of these, seventy-six percent of workers were not paid the legally required rate by their employers. Over two-thirds of workers were forced to work through their legally entitled lunch breaks.

• Twelve percent of workers who received tips, claimed that employers or supervisors had stolen their tips, which is illegal.

• Only one in five workers reported complaints to employers last year, and of these, forty-three percent experienced one or more forms of illegal retaliation as a result--firing, suspension, or threats to call immigration. Another twenty percent of workers who experienced dangerous working conditions or wage violations reported that they did not issue complaints out of fear of losing their job.

• Women were much more likely, according to the report, to endure a minimum wage violation than men, with female illegal immigrants at the highest rate. African-American workers born in the United States had a violation rate that tripled that of whites.

Annette Bernhart, an author of the study and policy co-director of the National Employment Law Project estimated on NPR that in a given week, around 1.1 million workers in the three major cities experience at least one violation with payment. That estimates nearly $56 million of lost wages in one week. This income is lost--money stolen from families, communities, and government. "This problem is not going away," Bernhard said, "if anything, we think it's just going to escalate"

The authors of the study advise that the best solution for preventing workplace violation is to educate workers about workplace rights, to make sure the workers have access to legal resources, to improve government monitoring of the workplace, and encourage workers not to have fear over employer retaliation--a sound plan for legal immigrants and U.S. residents, however difficult for illegal immigrants. The authors stated that any policy initiative aimed to reform workplace violations must also place national immigration reform at the top of the list, ensuring equal protection with the enforcement of employment and labor laws.

This study was published by the Institute for Research on Labor and Employment at the University of California at Los Angeles, the National Employment Law Project, and the Center for Urban Economic Development at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Low-Wage Workers Are Often Cheated, Study Says, New York Times, September 1, 2009

Solis Pledges Employment Law Crackdown, ForexTV.com, September 2, 3009

How the Lowest Paid Workers Get Ripped Off, U.S. News and World Report, September 3, 2009

Low-Wage Workers Suffer Financial Discrimination, NPR, September 3, 2009

Working Without Laws, The Nation/NPR, September 8, 2009

Related Web Resources:

U.S. Department of Labor

OSHA

Continue reading "Financial Discrimination for Low-wage Workers in Los Angeles" »

Bookmark and Share
September 1, 2009

California-based Company Indicted for OSHA Violations Causing Death of Five Workers

The California-based Company RPI Coating, Inc., Xcel Energy, and Public Service Company of Colorado, were indicted last week by a federal grand jury for violating workplace health and safety regulations that led to the deaths of five workers at a hydro-electric plant near Georgetown, Colorado, in October 2007.

Public Service Company of Colorado and Xcel Energy operate the hydro-electric plant, and hired RPI Coating, Inc. to re-line a 4,000-foot pipe, or penstock. The five men, employed by RPI were re-lining the pipe with a flammable epoxy liner when a fire erupted, blocking the escape route, and trapping the working men inside the tunnel. The men reportedly died within an hour due to asphyxiation after inhaling the carbon monoxide released from the fire.

The grand jury in Denver ruled that the five deaths were caused by a violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) workplace health and safety regulations--resulting in a fire, as well as the inability to effectively rescue the workers.

The Denver Post reported that all of the defendants including both president and vice president of RFI, Philippe Goutagny and James Thompson, were aware of the serious safety and health risks involved in the operation of the re-lining project. Even with the knowledge of these risks, a required confined-space permit needed for safety was not obtained. The employees were also not informed of the immediate danger with any posted signs.

The grand jury alleged that the companies were aware of previous incidents that posed threat to the employees, and failed to protect the men from potential danger by not obtaining a proper permit for the project. The indictment also accused the defendants of failing to conduct proper safety rescue evacuation plans for the men in case of immediate danger.

According to CNN, Greg Baxter, OSHA's Regional Administrator in Denver, claimed that if the defendants had properly followed their health and safety procedures, this catastrophic event could have been avoided.

RPI Coating, Inc., Xcel Energy, Inc., and Public Service Company of Colorado, are all charged with violating OSHA regulation on five counts, and for causing death--punishable by a maximum fine of $500,000.

RPI's James Thompson and Philippe Goutagny face the same charges, and with a conviction, could each be charged with up to $250,000 fines on five counts, and sentenced to a maximum of six months in prison.

Indictments in Deaths of Five Workers, The Denver Daily News, August 31, 2009

Xcel Energy, 2 Firms, 2 Men Indicted in 5 Colorado Deaths, CNN Money.com, August 28, 2009

Xcel Energy and Others Indicted for OHSA Violations That Caused Deaths, Workerscompensation.com/PR Newswire, August 20, 2009

Indictments Issued Over '07 Georgetown Plant Deaths, Denver Post.com, August 28, 2009

Related Web Resources:

OSHA

Continue reading "California-based Company Indicted for OSHA Violations Causing Death of Five Workers" »

Bookmark and Share